Comments on: What articles caught your attention this week?

By: Kirsten Wright

Kirsten Wright — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:42:16 +0000

Larry, it was in fact, completely sarcastic.

Most of my posts have some form of sarcasm in them, and I assumed that my readers would get that I was joking when they read the actual article. *note the sarcasm about the first article too: “I’ll never be productive again”.* Oh, and the second article thoughts was sarcasm again…just those 3 combining will not give all the answers in one place.

Just in case someone else gets confused though, I added the fact that I was being sarcastic…

By: Larry

Larry — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:33:59 +0000

Then again, maybe you were being sarcastic. Maybe I was the one who didn’t get it. Upon a closer, less paranoid read, I’ll allow for that possibility.

If that’s the case, my sincere apologies for the above overreaction. Wouldn’t be the first time I’ve swung back and hit the wrong offender (working on that).

If not, then refer to previous comment.
.-= Larry´s last blog ..Watch and Learn: 10 Television Shows for Writers =-.

By: Larry

Larry — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:10:48 +0000

Read Copyblogger again, Sparky. In no way the post says that “content is dead.” Not only is your comment wrong, and therefore irresponsible (check again, the word “dead” doesn’t appear in the post, nor is the implication), it says the wrong thing about YOU, in that you obviously didn’t get it. Maybe read it again, or maybe it’s just above your level of comprehension. Crap, my ass. Inaccurate smearing is what’s crap.
.-= Larry´s last blog ..Watch and Learn: 10 Television Shows for Writers =-.